The primary concern of aircraft maintenance is ensuring that mechanized parts are in working order. But, in terms of overall safety, aircraft maintenance must also consider the safety of cleaning/degreasing solutions that are used to clean accumulations from aircraft parts. Today, the safety of commercial degreasers is evaluated by three considerations: how they affect the parts they clean; how they affect the workers that apply them; and how they affect the environment. In some cases, aviation organizations are forced to switch to newer, safer degreaser due to EPA regulations. But even if your traditional degreaser isn’t scheduled for regulation, there are reasons to switch to a safer degreaser.
When aviation companies switch to a safer aircraft cleaning solution, the matter of most importance is finding a solution that offers the same effectiveness as the previous solution, which is usually possible. For example, aviation outfits that need a new solution for removing polysulfide sealant, cleaning accumulations of aviation hydraulic fluid, cleaning wheels and brakes and general aircraft cleaning can find the answer in Aero Kleen. Specifically designed for the applications mentioned above, Aero Kleen is supported by scientific evidence that shows its ability to clean as well or better than its toxic counterparts, as well its superiority to such solutions in terms of parts care, workplace safety and environmental effect. To choose the right treatment for your aircraft, you can contact 737 services. At this service, you are also served by excellent fleet engineers.
In terms of parts safety, the greatest drawback of traditional degreaser is its tendency to have a different effect on different metals, being safe for some while causing corrosion in others. In most cases, chemical corrosion is a gradual process that becomes visible before it progresses to the point of compromising a part’s effectiveness. But corrosion can also happen from the inside out when cleaning solution seeps inside part housings, making it implicit to use a commercial degreaser that is safe on all metals, which Aero Kleen is.
Concerning workplace safety, the greatest drawback of traditional degreaser is its emission of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs). HAPs are bad for the environment. But they also pose a serious risk to workers. Some companies attempt to combat HAPs with ventilation systems, which move HAPs away from a work area but don’t prevent them from entering the air. HAP related illnesses usually develop gradually. But when they do, the usual result is lawsuits that damage a company’s finances and reputation.
Regarding Environmental Safety, the greatest drawback of traditional degreaser is its containment of hazardous ingredients as defined by the EPA, the most prominent of which are chlorinated solvents. The hazardous solvents in traditional degreaser pose a dual problem: they release HAPs, which damage air quality and their waste solution have to be disposed of somewhere, which threatens soil and water quality. Understandably, most companies’ top concerns when shopping for new cleaning solutions are performance ability and cost-effectiveness. But when you can purchase a cleaner that performs as well or better, is ultimately more cost-effective, and is also more eco-friendly than traditional cleaners, refusing the switch is irresponsible.